What’s Really in the “Big Beautiful” Budget Bill?

You may have heard that the “Big Beautiful” budget bill now moving through Congress is designed to cut taxes, help working families, and reduce wasteful government spending. That’s the sales pitch. But once you look at what’s actually in the bill, the picture looks very different.

This post breaks it down in simple terms — what the bill says it does, what it actually does, and who it’s really for.

What Supporters Say

Supporters of the bill say it will:

• Lower taxes for working people

• Cut taxes on tips and overtime pay

• Eliminate wasteful programs

• Reduce the national debt

All of that sounds good. But the fine print tells a different story.

What’s Actually in the Bill

Large Tax Cuts — Mostly for the Wealthy

• The bill makes permanent the 2017 tax cuts that mostly benefited corporations and high-income earners.

• It adds new tax breaks like eliminating taxes on tips and overtime, which will help some workers — but the biggest benefits, in dollar terms, go to people with high incomes and large estates.

• It raises the amount of money wealthy families can pass down to their heirs without paying any federal estate tax — from about $13 million today to around $15 million per person, and more for couples. That’s tax-free inheritance of up to $30 million per household.

Deep Cuts to Social Programs

• To help pay for the tax cuts, the bill includes nearly $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid, food assistance (SNAP), and other social programs.

• These are programs that help low- and middle-income Americans afford healthcare, food, and basic needs.

Adds to the National Debt

• Even with the spending cuts, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill will add about $2.3 trillion to the national debt over the next 10 years.

• Other analysts suggest the total could be even higher.

What This Means in Practice

While the bill is being sold as pro-worker and fiscally responsible, the effects tell another story:

• People with the most wealth get the biggest long-term tax breaks — especially those planning to pass on large fortunes.

• People with lower incomes face reduced access to healthcare and food assistance.

• The national debt increases, despite claims of deficit reduction.

This is a pattern we’ve seen before: large tax cuts that mostly help the wealthy, followed by calls to shrink programs that working families depend on.

Final Thought

Whatever your political views, it’s worth looking past the headlines and reading between the lines. This bill gives a lot to those who already have the most — and asks those with the least to give something up.

The question isn’t whether tax cuts are good or bad. It’s: who are they for, and who pays for them?

This bill shifts money upward — not just now, but into future generations. And it does it while claiming to help working families and fix the debt. That’s a big promise. But it’s not what the bill actually delivers.

The Authoritarian Mirage — Why Strongmen Don’t Fix Inequality

“Authoritarianism doesn’t fix the system—it replaces one broken elite with another, and silences anyone who notices.”

Yesterday, we explored how inequality drives people toward authoritarianism, using four historical examples—Rome, Weimar Germany, Chile, and Russia. Today, we follow those stories to their next chapter:

What happened after the strongmen took power?

Did they fulfill their promises to restore fairness, punish corrupt elites, and make life better for ordinary people?

No. What they delivered instead was a new elite class, more tightly controlled and even less accountable—while the underlying economic injustices either deepened or were ignored altogether.

Rome — Empire and the Consolidation of Power

The Roman Republic collapsed under the weight of inequality, elite corruption, and political paralysis. Julius Caesar rose promising reform and justice for the common people—the populares.

But once the Republic gave way to imperial rule, what followed wasn’t equity—it was hierarchy on steroids.

• Land remained concentrated in elite hands; small farmers became dependent on state grain or military service.

• The imperial system rewarded loyalty, not justice. Power flowed upward, not outward.

• Citizenship and wealth became increasingly stratified, even as the empire expanded.

Yes, the Pax Romana brought temporary stability—but not justice or shared prosperity. The imperial system entrenched inequality and depended on conquest, slavery, and spectacle to pacify the masses.

Takeaway: Authoritarian Rome stabilized inequality—it didn’t solve it.

Weimar Germany → Nazi Germany — Prosperity Built on Plunder

Adolf Hitler rose to power claiming to fight corrupt elites and restore dignity to the German worker. He promised national renewal, economic growth, and a rebuke to the humiliations of Versailles.

He delivered temporary gains—unemployment fell, industry revived, and infrastructure projects flourished.

But the gains were built on:

• Militarization and debt, not sustainable growth,

• Theft from Jewish citizens, including seized businesses and homes,

• The exploitation of forced labor, in Germany and across occupied Europe.

Meanwhile, the regime:

• Protected and enriched industrial elites who aligned with Nazi goals,

• Crushed unions and eliminated labor rights,

• And used terror to suppress dissent, not reform the economy.

The Nazi system redistributed wealth from enemies of the regime to regime supporters—but it never challenged the underlying structures of privilege. It merely politicized them.

Takeaway: Authoritarian prosperity is often selective, violent, and temporary—and it leaves devastation in its wake.

Chile — From Crisis to Cronyism

General Augusto Pinochet seized power in 1973, with the backing of Chile’s economic and landowning elite and support from the U.S. He promised to end chaos and save the country from socialism.

His regime:

• Privatized pensions, schools, and healthcare,

• Crushed unions and outlawed strikes,

• And slashed public spending while offering lucrative contracts to insiders.

The economy grew for some—but inequality soared. Rural and poor urban communities were left behind, and the middle class struggled under insecurity. The military and connected families amassed wealth and influence.

When democracy returned in the 1990s, Chile had achieved growth—but with one of the most unequal economies in the OECD.

Takeaway: Authoritarianism in Chile wasn’t about saving the people—it was about saving elite privilege.

Russia — From Oligarchy to Autocracy

After the Soviet Union collapsed, Russia plunged into economic chaos. Privatization created a handful of billionaires, while ordinary citizens saw their life savings vanish.

Vladimir Putin rose as a stabilizer. He promised to control corruption and restore Russian pride.

Instead, he built:

• A kleptocratic state, where oligarchs thrived as long as they remained loyal,

• A hollow democracy, where elections are rigged and dissent is criminalized,

• And an economy dependent on resource extraction, with wealth concentrated in Moscow and St. Petersburg.

Rural regions remain deeply impoverished. Independent wealth is seen as a threat. And economic mobility is virtually nonexistent for those outside the elite circle.

Takeaway: Authoritarianism didn’t cure Russia’s inequality—it simply rebranded it, then made it unchallengeable.

The Pattern Is Clear

Authoritarian leaders do not dismantle corrupt systems. They capture them.

They don’t lift up the poor. They silence them.

And they don’t share power. They consolidate it.

Inequality remains—not as a problem to solve, but as a tool of control, used to reward the loyal and punish the rest.

Tomorrow: What Actually Works

If authoritarianism fails to deliver economic justice, where has it actually been achieved?

Tomorrow, we explore historical cases where inequality was meaningfully reduced—not through repression, but through land reform, labor protections, progressive taxation, and democratic investment in people.

Because inequality can be reversed. But it takes policy—not personality cults.

History Repeats — How Inequality Breeds Authoritarianism

“The most dangerous inequality is not just economic—it’s the belief that the system no longer works for you.”

Yesterday we explored how wealth inequality in America has reached staggering levels. Today, we look at why that matters not just for fairness or economics—but for democracy itself.

When inequality grows unchecked, it doesn’t just erode opportunity. It erodes legitimacy. And throughout history, that erosion has often led to a disturbing outcome: the rise of authoritarianism.

The Link Between Inequality and Authoritarianism

When the gap between rich and poor becomes a chasm, several dangerous dynamics take hold:

• People lose faith in institutions that appear to serve only the wealthy.

• Polarization intensifies, as communities blame one another rather than the system.

• Scapegoats are manufactured, often targeting vulnerable groups.

• Strongmen rise, promising to restore order, punish elites, and reclaim national pride.

This isn’t theoretical. It’s happened before—repeatedly. And the consequences have been devastating.

Case 1: Ancient Rome — The Collapse of the Republic

In the final centuries of the Roman Republic, land ownership became highly concentrated. Wealthy elites gobbled up small farms, turning farmers into urban poor and military conscripts. Reformers like the Gracchi brothers were assassinated. Gridlock in the Senate gave way to chaos in the streets.

Into this void stepped charismatic generals—Sulla, Pompey, Caesar—who promised to restore Rome’s greatness. The Republic, weakened by inequality and political paralysis, crumbled into empire.

Takeaway: Democracy can’t survive when economic and political power are hoarded by a few.

Case 2: Weimar Germany — The Fertile Ground for Fascism

Germany’s defeat in World War I triggered economic ruin, hyperinflation, and mass unemployment. The working class struggled, while industrialists and financial elites maneuvered to protect their wealth. Public confidence in the young Weimar Republic collapsed.

Adolf Hitler didn’t rise in a vacuum. He exploited a desperate population, offering simple answers, restored dignity, and national renewal. The Nazis used democracy to destroy it, and Germany paid a catastrophic price.

Takeaway: Economic despair + elite impunity = fertile ground for authoritarianism.

Case 3: Chile — From Inequality to Military Rule

In the 1960s and early ’70s, Chile was a deeply unequal society, with vast wealth concentrated in the hands of a few landowning and industrial families. President Salvador Allende’s socialist reforms, including nationalizations and land redistribution, polarized the country.

Fearing leftist revolution and the loss of their privilege, elites supported a U.S.-backed military coup in 1973. General Augusto Pinochet seized power, brutally repressed dissent, and implemented neoliberal economic policies that enriched a new elite while impoverishing many.

Takeaway: Authoritarianism often emerges not from revolution—but from a backlash against redistributive reform.

Case 4: Russia — From Oligarchy to Autocracy

After the fall of the Soviet Union, Russia’s economy was rapidly privatized. A handful of insiders became oligarchs, while pensions vanished, wages collapsed, and life expectancy dropped. Democracy was a brief, chaotic interlude.

Vladimir Putin rose by promising order and dignity—and by aligning himself with the new elite. Under his rule, dissent has been crushed, media muzzled, and inequality entrenched. Today, Russia is a managed autocracy serving billionaires and loyalists.

Takeaway: When democracy fails to deliver security, people may trade freedom for stability.

Why This Matters Now

In the United States, inequality is reaching levels that mirror these precursors:

• Massive wealth concentration.

• Widespread economic anxiety.

• Collapse of trust in government and media.

• Rising political extremism.

• Calls for a strongman to “take the country back.”

This is not to say history will repeat itself exactly—but the patterns are clear. When democracy fails to address inequality, authoritarianism doesn’t just become possible—it becomes tempting.

Tomorrow: Do Authoritarians Fix Inequality?

Strongman leaders often promise to dismantle corrupt elites and restore power to “the people.” But do they actually do it?

Tomorrow, we’ll look at what happens once authoritarian regimes take power—and whether they ever succeed in addressing the economic injustice that helped them rise.

(They don’t.)

Wealth Inequality in America Today

“The issue isn’t that the system is broken. It’s that it’s working exactly as designed—for the wealthy few.”

America likes to think of itself as a land of opportunity, where hard work pays off and each generation can rise above the last. But for millions of people, that story no longer rings true. Instead, a different reality is taking hold—one where wealth is concentrated in fewer hands than at any time since the Gilded Age, and where the vast majority of Americans are shut out of the prosperity they help create.

A Nation of Growing Gaps

Over the past four decades, wealth inequality in the United States has exploded:

• The top 1% of households now own more wealth than the bottom 90% combined.

• The median Black household owns about one-tenth the wealth of the median white household.

• The top 10% control over 89% of stock market wealth, while half the country owns no stock at all.

This isn’t just about billionaires flying to space or buying up islands. It’s about the cost of living outpacing wages, young people burdened with debt before their lives begin, and entire communities shut out of wealth-building opportunities like homeownership and higher education.

How Did We Get Here?

This didn’t happen by accident. Since the 1980s, a series of policy choices have tilted the playing field:

• Tax cuts for the wealthy shifted the burden onto working families.

• Union power was dismantled, lowering wages and job security.

• Public services were privatized or underfunded, turning basic needs into profit centers.

• Education and healthcare costs skyrocketed, trapping people in debt.

• Meanwhile, wealth multiplies for those who already have it, through stock gains, property appreciation, and inheritances.

The result is a society where mobility is shrinking, resentment is growing, and faith in democratic institutions is crumbling.

Inequality Is More Than Just Unfair—it’s Dangerous

When people feel like the system only works for the rich, they stop believing in the system. That’s where we are now:

• Trust in government is near historic lows.

• Many Americans believe their children will be worse off than they are.

• And increasing numbers are drawn to authoritarian promises of order, strength, and a return to greatness.

This isn’t just an economic problem. It’s a political one. And if we don’t address it, inequality could become the wedge that breaks democracy apart.

What Comes Next

Over the next six days, we’ll explore how wealth inequality has fueled authoritarianism in history, why strongman regimes fail to fix the problem, what real redistribution has looked like when it has worked, and what bold but realistic steps the U.S. can take to reverse this crisis.

Because the truth is: inequality is not inevitable. It’s a choice. And so is what we do about it.

A Moral Marketplace: How We Move Forward

Adam Smith trusted in the power of markets. But more importantly, he trusted in the moral imagination of human beings.

He believed that sympathy, fairness, and a sense of justice would guide us — individually and collectively — to create societies that could thrive.

We have forgotten part of that vision.
But we can remember it.
We can rebuild it.

Because a better future doesn’t require us to invent something new. It requires us to complete the story we left unfinished.

A Moral Marketplace Is Possible

A market system grounded in morality isn’t just a dream. It’s a real, practical goal — one that starts with reconnecting freedom and responsibility.

In a moral marketplace:

• Businesses compete fairly, not by rigging the rules.

• Workers are treated with dignity, not as disposable inputs.

• Communities are partners in prosperity, not collateral damage.

• Public goods are seen as essential investments, not inconvenient costs.

• Economic success is measured not just by profits, but by how widely those profits lift lives.

We don’t have to accept a system where exploitation is inevitable. We can create a system where ambition, ingenuity, and compassion reinforce each other.

Practical Steps Toward a Moral Marketplace

Restoring the balance won’t happen overnight. But it starts with choices — policies, business models, cultural shifts — that move us toward Smith’s full vision.

Here are some ways forward:

Protect Real Competition

• Enforce antitrust laws to break up monopolies and cartels.

• Encourage innovation by ensuring new entrants can challenge established giants.

• Prevent financial engineering that rewards consolidation over creativity.

Strengthen Worker Rights and Dignity

• Support fair wages, safe conditions, and bargaining rights.

• Recognize workers as partners in prosperity, not obstacles to efficiency.

• Promote ownership models that share the rewards of success more broadly (like employee ownership plans and cooperatives).

Invest in Public Goods

• Recommit to universal access to education, healthcare, and infrastructure.

• Level the playing field so that ambition and talent — not birth or privilege — determine opportunity.

Reward Value Creation, Not Value Extraction

• Reform tax systems to favor long-term investment over short-term speculation.

• Discourage business models that profit from cutting corners, gutting companies, or exploiting loopholes.

Hold Power Accountable

• Strengthen transparency requirements for corporations and political donations.

• Rebuild independent institutions that serve the public, not private interests.

Foster a Culture of Ethical Business Leadership

• Teach business ethics as essential, not optional.

• Celebrate leaders who act as stewards of prosperity, not just hunters of profit.

Change Is Already Happening — Quietly, Powerfully

Across the world, people are already pushing back against the idea that markets must be amoral to succeed.

• Social enterprises combine profit with mission.

• B Corporations commit legally to balancing profit and public good.

• Impact investing channels capital toward sustainable, ethical businesses.

• Worker cooperatives are reclaiming ownership for those who build value every day.

The seeds are already planted.
What’s needed now is sunlight, water, and time — and the collective belief that something better is not only possible, but necessary.

Reclaiming Smith’s True Legacy

Adam Smith never imagined a perfect world. He knew human beings were flawed, passionate, ambitious.

But he also knew we were capable of sympathy, fairness, and wisdom.

He believed that when we balance freedom with morality, competition with justice, self-interest with public good — we could create prosperity that uplifts whole societies, not just a fortunate few.

That is the unfinished work we inherit.
That is the promise we can still fulfill.

The Final Word

The future of markets — and the future of our societies — is not written in stone. It’s shaped every day by the choices we make.

Will we continue to separate economics from ethics, and watch trust, opportunity, and resilience erode? Or will we restore the balance Smith envisioned, and build markets that serve not only the wealthy, but all of humanity?

The choice is ours.
The work is ours.

And the future can still be worthy of our highest hopes.

Thank you for joining me for this series.

Together, we can finish the story Adam Smith started — and build something truly lasting.

Restoring the Balance: Why Morality Matters to Markets

The story we’ve traced so far is not a story of inevitable decline. It’s a story of choices — choices made, and choices still open to us.

We lost sight of Adam Smith’s full vision. But we can recover it.

And if we want markets that truly serve humanity — not just the privileged few — we must.

Because morality is not a luxury we add to an economy once it succeeds. It’s the foundation that allows success to be shared, sustained, and worthy.

Markets Were Always Meant to Be Moral

Adam Smith’s vision was never a free-for-all. It was freedom disciplined by conscience.

He understood that ambition, energy, and innovation are powerful — but dangerous without the guardrails of justice, trust, and mutual respect.

Smith believed:

• Markets work best when competition is real and fair

• Prosperity thrives when individuals feel accountable to one another

• Justice is not a “nice to have” — it’s the first duty of a functioning society

“Society cannot subsist among those who are at all times ready to hurt and injure one another.”

— The Theory of Moral Sentiments, II.ii.3

Freedom without morality doesn’t create prosperity. It creates instability, resentment, and collapse.

True markets — Smith’s markets — require us to remember our responsibilities to one another, not just our rights.

What Happens When Morality is Missing?

When we strip morality away from markets, we see the familiar consequences:

• Trust erodes. People stop believing the system is fair.

• Power concentrates. Markets that were meant to be open tilt toward monopolies and cronyism.

• Innovation slows. Risk-taking becomes extractive rather than creative.

• Social cohesion frays. Inequality deepens, anger rises, and society becomes vulnerable to extremism.

In a world without the moral sentiments Smith described, the invisible hand doesn’t guide us toward the common good. It clenches into a fist.

Why Morality Isn’t Optional — It’s Essential

Restoring morality to markets is not about nostalgia for a golden age that never truly existed. It’s about understanding a deeper truth:

We cannot separate economics from ethics.

When markets are fair, when opportunity is real, when dignity is honored, the results are not just morally satisfying — they are economically stronger.

Healthy societies create healthy economies.
Respected workers build better businesses.
Trusted institutions enable more innovation and investment.
Shared prosperity strengthens the very engine of growth.

Morality is not a constraint on prosperity.
It is a condition of prosperity.

What Restoring Balance Looks Like

Bringing Smith’s full vision back into focus would mean transforming key aspects of modern capitalism:

• Encouraging genuine competition and breaking up monopolistic power

• Investing in public goods — education, healthcare, infrastructure — so more people can participate

• Rebuilding worker dignity and bargaining power

• Enforcing justice — not just for the poor and powerless, but also for the wealthy and influential

• Fostering a culture of business ethics, not just legal compliance

It’s about designing systems that reward creation over extraction, stewardship over short-termism, fairness over favoritism.

It’s about expecting better — from our leaders, our institutions, and ourselves.

The Good News: We Are Not Starting from Scratch

The forces Adam Smith trusted — sympathy, justice, imagination — are still within us.

Every day, around the world, people build businesses that treat workers with respect.
Entrepreneurs create value not by exploiting, but by innovating. Communities organize to demand fairer systems.
Consumers reward companies that show real responsibility.

We have more tools today than Smith ever dreamed of:

• Faster communication

• Broader education

• Globalized networks of ideas and solidarity

If we choose to remember the full Smith — not just the economic architect, but the moral philosopher — we have everything we need to build a better future.

Moving Forward

Restoring the balance between markets and morality is not about abandoning capitalism. It’s about completing it.

It’s about reclaiming the promise Smith saw: A world where individual ambition and public good are not enemies — but allies.

Where prosperity is not hoarded — but shared.
Where markets are free — and fair.
Where dignity, justice, and opportunity walk hand in hand.

In the final post of this series, we’ll explore practical steps — large and small — that could help move us toward a moral marketplace that works for all.

Because the future isn’t written yet. And we are the ones who will write it.

---

Tomorrow

A Moral Marketplace: How We Move Forward

When Markets Turn Predatory: Private Equity and the Broken Promises of Capitalism

Adam Smith believed that free markets, anchored by morality and competition, could create prosperity for all.

But he also knew that where moral sentiment and justice are weak, markets can be twisted into tools of extraction, exploitation, and entrenchment.

Today, one of the clearest examples of this corruption is found in a powerful force reshaping modern capitalism: private equity.

Private Equity: The Business of Extraction

In theory, private equity is simple: A firm buys a company, improves it, and sells it for a profit.

In practice, it often looks very different.

A common private equity playbook works like this:

• Borrow heavily to buy a company (using the company’s own assets as collateral)

• Load the company with debt, making it financially fragile

• Cut costs aggressively — often through layoffs, slashed benefits, or service cuts

• Pay themselves fees regardless of company performance

• Sell the company — or leave it bankrupt — after extracting as much value as possible

The goal is not to build a better business.
The goal is to maximize short-term profits for the investors, regardless of the long-term consequences.

Jobs, communities, customers — even the survival of the company itself — are secondary.

This is not the creative, dynamic capitalism Adam Smith envisioned.

This is parasitic behavior: taking without creating.

The Collapse of Real Competition

Private equity has also fueled market concentration. By rolling up competitors and consolidating industries, firms reduce competition — often leading to:

• Higher prices for consumers

• Worse service

• Lower wages for workers

Smith warned relentlessly about the dangers of monopolies and collusion:

“People of the same trade seldom meet together… but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public.”

— The Wealth of Nations, I.x.c.27

When a handful of private firms control entire sectors — from healthcare to housing to retail — real competition dies.
The invisible hand is shackled.
The public pays the price.

Rent-Seeking Disguised as Investment

True investment creates value: new products, new jobs, new wealth for society.

Rent-seeking extracts value from existing structures without creating anything new.

Private equity, in its predatory forms, has mastered the art of rent-seeking:

• Charging management fees whether companies succeed or fail

• Stripping real estate from businesses and selling it off for a quick cash boost

• Declaring dividends to themselves funded by debt, not profits

These practices are defended in the language of capitalism — “efficiency,” “risk-taking,” “market discipline” — but they bear little resemblance to the productive competition Smith championed.

Smith valued self-interest that served society through competition — not self-interest that hollowed society out from the inside.

The Human Cost

The victims of predatory private equity aren’t abstract balance sheets. They are real people.

• Workers laid off with no safety net.

• Communities losing essential services.

• Consumers paying more for worse goods.

• Pension funds raided and drained.

• Entire industries destabilized.

Smith argued that a flourishing economy depends on a stable, just society. When companies treat human beings as disposable, they are not creating wealth — they are cannibalizing it.

This Is Not Capitalism — It’s Market Plundering

If Adam Smith were alive today, he would likely view much of modern private equity with deep skepticism, if not outright condemnation.

He would see:

• Freedom distorted into license

• Competition strangled by consolidation

• Wealth hoarded by a few at the expense of the many

• Justice — the first duty of society — undermined

Markets can serve humanity.
Or markets can devour humanity.

Without the moral sentiments, without the impartial spectator, without justice, there is no invisible hand guiding us toward the public good.

There is only the visible claw of greed.

A Moment of Reckoning

Understanding how markets have gone astray is not about nostalgia. It’s about recognizing that the foundation Smith imagined is still possible — but only if we rebuild the balance between freedom and morality.

In the next post, we’ll step back and look at the bigger picture: Why restoring Adam Smith’s full vision isn’t just morally right — it’s economically necessary.

---

Tomorrow

Restoring the Balance: Why Morality Matters to Markets

The Great Forgetting: How Modern Capitalism Lost Its Moral Compass

Adam Smith gave us a vision of free markets anchored in morality, justice, and public trust.

For a time, the world tried — imperfectly, unevenly — to walk that path.

But over the last two centuries, something changed.
Gradually at first. Then faster.
Until, today, we barely recognize the balance Smith worked so hard to describe.

We remembered the freedom.
We forgot the morality.
We celebrated self-interest.
We abandoned the impartial spectator.

In chasing the wealth of nations, we lost sight of the moral sentiments that made that wealth sustainable — and worth having.

The Selective Reading of Adam Smith

In the 19th and 20th centuries, as industrialization spread and new economic theories emerged, Adam Smith’s name became a banner for the champions of free markets.

But too often, people invoked Smith’s ideas selectively — quoting the invisible hand, while ignoring the moral hand Smith believed must guide it.

• Self-interest was celebrated.

• Moral restraint was treated as optional.

• Competition was praised, but collusion and monopoly were quietly tolerated when profitable.

Smith’s vision was not of a marketplace free from responsibility. It was of a marketplace embedded in a society of conscience.

By forgetting that, we laid the groundwork for many of the challenges we face today.

Freedom Without Responsibility

In modern capitalist economies, freedom became the ultimate good — often at the expense of responsibility.

Markets were deregulated, justified by the belief that the invisible hand would naturally sort everything out. Corporations were granted more rights, with fewer obligations to the public. Finance grew increasingly detached from real goods, real services, and real communities.

But Smith never imagined a world where companies could become “too big to fail.” He never envisioned an economy where speculation could outpace production by orders of magnitude.

He warned of the very dangers that unchecked markets would create:

“The proposal of any new law or regulation of commerce which comes from this order [the merchants and manufacturers] ought always to be listened to with great precaution.”

— The Wealth of Nations, I.xi.p.10

Smith understood that those with wealth and power would often conspire against the public — not because they were evil, but because it was in their interest to do so.

That’s why strong institutions and a vigilant public were necessary.

Freedom alone was never enough.

The Rise of Rent-Seeking and Monopolies

Another forgotten part of Smith’s warning was his hatred of rent-seeking — the practice of extracting wealth without creating new value.

Today, rent-seeking dominates entire sectors:

• Financial firms profiting from speculation rather than investment

• Private equity stripping companies for parts rather than building them

• Tech monopolies using their size to stifle competition rather than innovate

These behaviors do not serve the common good. They serve a narrow private interest, at society’s expense.

And yet, they are often defended in Smith’s name — a bitter irony, given that he would likely have opposed them fiercely.

The Human Cost of the Great Forgetting

The consequences of losing Smith’s moral compass are not just economic. They are deeply human.

• Workers treated as disposable assets, not partners in production.

• Communities hollowed out by waves of offshoring, consolidation, and financialization.

• Public trust eroded, as people increasingly see the economy as rigged against them.

• Politics captured by the very wealthy, creating policies that deepen inequality.

When the moral sentiments are stripped away from economic life, we are left with markets that serve the few, while asking the many to bear the cost.

Not What Smith Wanted — or Imagined

Smith’s dream was not a market that rewarded greed without restraint. It was a society where individual ambition was harmonized with public virtue, where free exchange and free conscience worked together to lift all.

We have lost that balance.

We have lost the heart of Smith’s vision.

But the good news is: We can find it again.

In the next post, we’ll look closely at one of the clearest betrayals of Smith’s ideals — how private equity, monopolies, and financial engineering have turned markets into tools of extraction rather than creation. And we’ll ask: What would Adam Smith say about the capitalism of today?

---

Tomorrow

When Markets Turn Predatory: Private Equity and the Broken Promises of Capitalism

The Wealth of Nations: Freedom, Competition, and Prosperity

After years of thinking deeply about human morality, Adam Smith turned his attention to another question: How do societies grow wealthy?

By the time The Wealth of Nations appeared in 1776, Smith had spent a lifetime studying not only philosophy, but law, politics, and commerce. He was deeply familiar with the systems that shaped people’s lives — and the systems that trapped them.

And he was convinced that the old ways weren’t working.

Breaking Free from the Mercantile System

At the time Smith was writing, most governments tightly controlled trade. They imposed heavy tariffs, protected monopolies, and saw the economy as a zero-sum game: one nation’s gain was another’s loss.

Smith rejected this vision.

He argued that when individuals were free to pursue their own interests — within a framework of justice — they would unintentionally contribute to the wealth of society as a whole.

This was the revolutionary idea behind the famous metaphor of the invisible hand.

Not magic. Not chaos. But a complex, decentralized dance of human effort and ingenuity — coordinated not by kings or ministers, but by market forces.

“By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it.”

— The Wealth of Nations, IV.ii.9

Freedom, properly channeled, could unleash creativity, productivity, and shared prosperity.

The Power of the Division of Labor

One of Smith’s most important insights was simple but profound: Specialization makes people — and societies — vastly more productive.

He famously described a pin factory, where breaking down production into distinct, specialized tasks allowed workers to make far more pins together than they ever could alone.

The principle applied far beyond pins. It explained how entire economies could grow rapidly when individuals focused on what they did best and traded for what they needed.

Division of labor, combined with free exchange, allowed human beings to achieve levels of abundance unimaginable in previous centuries.

Competition: The True Engine of Progress

Smith believed that competition was essential to keeping markets healthy.

When businesses must compete for customers, they must:

• Offer better products

• Lower prices

• Innovate faster

• Treat people better (or risk losing their trust)

Left unchecked, businesses would often conspire to rig prices, block competitors, or exploit workers — exactly the kinds of behaviors Smith warned against.

He praised markets not because businessmen were saints, but because competition forces businesses to serve the public interest whether they want to or not.

“The interest of the producer ought to be attended to only so far as it may be necessary for promoting that of the consumer.”

— The Wealth of Nations, IV.viii.49

In other words: the market is for the people, not the corporations.

The Proper Role of Government

Despite his reputation as a champion of free markets, Smith believed governments had critical duties:

• Protecting justice (enforcing contracts, preventing fraud and violence)

• Building public infrastructure (roads, bridges, harbors — things private businesses wouldn’t build themselves)

• Providing education (to help individuals fully participate in economic life)

Smith understood that free markets did not exist in a vacuum. They needed laws, institutions, and public goods to function well.

He was no anarchist. He believed in a limited but active government — one that protected freedom and ensured fairness.

Self-Interest, but Not Selfishness

Smith’s economic theory recognized the power of self-interest — the desire to improve one’s own condition. But it was never meant to justify greed without restraint.

The self-interest Smith described was bounded by:

• The inner voice of the impartial spectator (moral conscience)

• The outer rules of justice (government and law)

• The competitive pressure of free markets (social discipline)

When these forces worked together, they could create extraordinary prosperity. When any of them was weakened or ignored, the system could easily slide into exploitation and injustice.

The Bigger Picture

Adam Smith’s vision in The Wealth of Nations was hopeful — but it was never naive.

He understood that markets could empower human beings. He also understood that they needed to be nurtured and restrained by moral and institutional forces.

Prosperity wasn’t guaranteed.
It depended on balance.

In the next post, we’ll explore how modern capitalism — by forgetting Smith’s moral and institutional warnings — has lost that balance, and what it has cost us.

---

Tomorrow

The Great Forgetting: How Modern Capitalism Lost Its Moral Compass

The Moral Heart: Exploring The Theory of Moral Sentiments

Before Adam Smith ever wrote about markets, he wrote about something much closer to home: our hearts.

In The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759), Smith tackled the biggest question of all:
What holds human society together?

It’s not wealth.
It’s not laws.
It’s not power.

It’s something far more delicate — and far more powerful.
Our capacity to care about each other.

Sympathy: The Foundation of Society

Smith believed that human beings are naturally equipped with sympathy — what we today might call empathy. We have the ability to imagine what others feel, to share in their joys and sorrows, to see the world through their eyes.

This sympathy, Smith argued, is not perfect.
We don’t feel it equally toward everyone.
It’s stronger for those close to us, weaker for distant strangers.
But it’s there, always — a vital thread connecting us to one another.

Without it, there could be no trust, no cooperation, no society at all.

“How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature, which interest him in the fortune of others.”

— The Theory of Moral Sentiments, I.i.1

In Smith’s view, morality doesn’t come from rigid external rules. It springs up organically from our sympathy, our desire to be loved, and our wish to deserve that love.

The Impartial Spectator: Our Inner Moral Compass

Smith introduced a brilliant idea:
Inside each of us, there lives an imagined figure — the impartial spectator.

When we make decisions, when we reflect on our actions, we imagine how a fair and reasonable observer would judge us. Not how our friends or enemies might flatter or condemn us, but how a truly unbiased, moral being would see us.

The impartial spectator helps us check our passions.
It encourages us to act justly even when it’s inconvenient.
It helps us strive to be the kind of person we would respect.

Without this inner voice, Smith believed, we would be lost in selfishness and chaos.

“Man naturally desires, not only to be loved, but to be lovely.”

— The Theory of Moral Sentiments, III.ii.1

We don’t just want admiration.
We want to deserve admiration.
That’s the real anchor of human morality.

Justice: The Bedrock of Civilization

Smith made a crucial distinction:
Love and generosity are beautiful.
But society does not depend on everyone being saints.

At minimum, society requires justice — a shared agreement not to harm one another.

Justice, for Smith, was the first and most essential virtue of a stable society. Without it, no economy, no government, no community could survive.

Governments, in Smith’s view, existed first and foremost to protect justice: to prevent violence, fraud, and oppression.

Freedom and prosperity could only flourish on the solid ground of justice.

The Temptation of Wealth and Status

Smith also warned of a powerful and dangerous human tendency:
Our admiration for the rich and powerful, even when they are undeserving.

We are drawn to success.
We are dazzled by wealth.
And in that dazzlement, we sometimes confuse material fortune with moral worth.

Smith worried that this confusion could rot societies from within — Elevating the undeserving while neglecting the truly virtuous.

Sound familiar?

“The great mob of mankind are the admirers and worshippers, and, what may seem more extraordinary, most frequently the disinterested admirers and worshippers of wealth and greatness.”

— The Theory of Moral Sentiments, I.iii.3

A Moral Vision for Humanity

In The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Adam Smith painted a vision of humanity as naturally social, emotional, and moral.
Yes, we act in our own self-interest.
But we also crave connection, fairness, and self-respect.

For Smith, morality was not a fragile add-on to human life. It was the foundation.

Without sympathy, without conscience, without justice, there could be no trust.
Without trust, there could be no society.
And without society, there could be no markets — no wealth, no freedom, no future.

Setting the Stage

When Smith turned his attention to economics later in The Wealth of Nations, he built on this moral foundation.

He wasn’t advocating selfishness without limits.
He was proposing a system where free individuals, guided by internal moral compasses and protected by laws of justice, could create prosperity together.

He believed freedom and morality needed to walk hand in hand.

In the next post, we’ll explore the ideas in The Wealth of Nations — and see how Smith’s vision for economic life flowed naturally from his understanding of human morality.

---

Tomorrow

The Wealth of Nations: Freedom, Competition, and Prosperity

Meet the Real Adam Smith

When most people hear the name Adam Smith, one image pops up almost instantly:

The father of capitalism.

Maybe you think of the invisible hand, gently guiding markets.

Maybe you think of self-interest, and the idea that by pursuing our own gain, we somehow benefit society.

Maybe you picture a wise old economist laying down the foundations for free markets, open competition, and the world we know today.

There’s just one problem:

That’s only half the story.

And without the other half, the half we’ve largely forgotten, we risk misunderstanding not only Smith — but the entire system that shapes our lives.

The Other Book — and the Other Smith

Long before Adam Smith wrote The Wealth of Nations in 1776, he had already spent decades thinking about a deeper question:

What makes human society even possible in the first place?

The result was a different masterpiece: The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759).

In it, Smith explored something that today’s headlines often seem to forget:

That human beings are not just rational calculators chasing profit.
We are emotional, social, empathetic creatures.
We care about fairness. We are guided by a sense of justice.
We judge our own actions — and the actions of others — not just by outcomes, but by what feels right.

Before Smith talked about free markets, he talked about moral instincts.
About sympathy. About the invisible forces of conscience that bind us together.

He didn’t see self-interest and morality as opposites.
He saw them as forces that had to be kept in balance.

Freedom Was Never Meant to Stand Alone

When Smith later wrote The Wealth of Nations, he built on this moral foundation. He believed that free markets, powered by individuals pursuing their goals, could unleash prosperity.

But he assumed that people would still be guided by their conscience — by what he called the “impartial spectator” within each of us.
He assumed that governments would enforce justice, protect competition, and invest in the public good.
He assumed that markets would operate within a larger moral society.

Smith knew that freedom without morality would not lead to prosperity.
It would lead to corruption, concentration of power, exploitation — the very things he warned about.

What We Forgot — and Why It Matters Now

Over the last two centuries, something critical happened:
We remembered the markets.
We forgot the morality.

We remembered the invisible hand.
We forgot the moral compass that guided it.

Today, we see the consequences all around us:

• Rising inequality

• Corporate monopolies

• Workers treated as disposable

• Short-term profits prioritized over long-term health

This isn’t the capitalism Adam Smith envisioned.
This is capitalism without its conscience.

Reclaiming the Full Vision

This series is about finding our way back.

Over the next seven posts, we’ll walk through:

• The moral insights of The Theory of Moral Sentiments

• The economic ideas of The Wealth of Nations

• How modern capitalism diverged from Smith’s true vision

• And most importantly, how we can restore the lost balance between morality and markets — for a healthier, fairer, and more resilient future.

Smith understood that markets and morality are not enemies.
They are partners.

If we want an economy that truly works for people — all people — we have to finish reading Adam Smith. Not just the parts that serve narrow interests.
The whole story.

---

Tomorrow

The Moral Heart: Exploring The Theory of Moral Sentiments

Two Crises, One Cause

And How We Rebuild

The heist wasn’t an accident.
And it wasn’t isolated.

It wasn’t just Toys R Us.
It wasn’t just JoAnn Fabrics.
It wasn’t just one hospital, one town, one lost job, one empty mall.

It was — and is — a system.
A machine designed to strip-mine value out of the real economy while protecting and enriching the people already at the top.

Private equity didn’t invent this machine.
They simply became its most efficient operators.

The Two Crises Are One Crisis

This week, in False Promises, we mapped how political corruption, short-term thinking, and false solutions are actively weakening America’s global standing.

Here, in The Private Equity Heist, we mapped how financial predation and corporate looting are hollowing out America’s internal strength — its businesses, its workers, its communities.

They are not separate problems.
They are symptoms of the same disease.

A country led by liars and grifters, serving liars and grifters, at the expense of everyone else.

• Where the debts are never really paid — because the people who caused them are never the ones paying.

• Where success is measured not by what you build, but how much you can grab before the roof caves in.

• Where the public is left clinging to slogans and scapegoats while the real looters slip away smiling.

What We Lost — and What We Could Still Save

We lost businesses that were part of the fabric of American life.
We lost good jobs, stable careers, pensions, community institutions.

But more than anything, we lost trust.

Trust that the system would reward honest work.
Trust that building something real would be safer than looting something fragile.
Trust that if you played by the rules, you wouldn’t be thrown away when someone else wanted a bigger bonus.

Rebuilding that trust will be harder than passing any single law.

But it’s not impossible.

How We Rebuild

Expose the Heist

Make the system visible.
Call out the looting for what it is — not “bad management,” not “market forces,” but deliberate extraction.

Rein in Predators

Regulate leveraged buyouts.
Ban dividend recapitalizations.
Force real accountability onto private equity owners.

Strengthen Labor

Unions, worker co-ops, and employee ownership aren’t side issues — they’re bulwarks against looters.

Reclaim Public Investment

Stop handing public money to predatory firms through pension funds, subsidies, and tax breaks.
Invest in businesses that invest in people.

Refuse the False Choices

We don’t have to choose between corruption and collapse.
We can demand an economy — and a government — that rewards building, not looting.

The heist isn’t over.

But neither is the story.

If enough of us are willing to look clearly at what happened, name the culprits, and fight for something better, we don’t just stop the next heist.

We start rebuilding something that was stolen from us long ago:
an economy, a democracy, and a future worth trusting again.

Choosing Our Future

Why We Must Reject the False Promises of Trump’s Second Term

After six posts, the pattern is undeniable: the policies Donald Trump promises for his second term aren’t bold new ideas. They are recycled failures — tested in states like Kansas and Texas, seen abroad in places like El Salvador and Britain, and proven to hurt the very people they claim to help.

Behind the slogans about “making America great” is a grim reality:

• Economic nationalism has raised prices, hurt farmers, and cost manufacturing jobs.

• Immigration crackdowns have crippled industries and driven up consumer costs.

• Authoritarian law-and-order tactics have undermined civil rights and judicial independence.

• Deregulation and privatization have left Americans more vulnerable to disaster and inequality.

• Environmental rollbacks have made our communities less safe and forfeited leadership in the industries of the future.

• Empty debt-cutting promises have only grown the national debt, leaving taxpayers holding the bill.

Each of these failures springs from the same deeper problem:

A fundamental misunderstanding of what truly makes a nation strong.

Strength doesn’t come from isolating ourselves, deporting our neighbors, cutting vital services, or gutting our institutions.

Strength comes from building — trust, infrastructure, education, innovation, opportunity.

Strength comes from investing — in people, communities, and the resilience needed for the challenges of tomorrow.

The High Stakes of 2025 and Beyond

The global order that helped ensure American prosperity for generations — Pax Americana — was built on trust, stability, and the rule of law. Trump’s second-term agenda threatens to tear that down:

• By destabilizing trade and pushing allies away.

• By undermining the judiciary and punishing dissent.

• By allowing infrastructure, public health, and education to wither.

America’s strength has never come from walls or tariffs. It has come from being a beacon of opportunity, freedom, and reliability — at home and abroad.

If we abandon that in favor of fear, cruelty, and short-term political wins, the damage may be irreparable.

The Choice Ahead

This is not just a choice about Donald Trump.

It’s a choice about the kind of country we want to live in — and the kind of future we want to leave to our children.

Do we cling to failed ideas that have already cost us so much?

Or do we move forward, with honest leadership, smarter policy, and a renewed commitment to what made America strong in the first place?

The next chapter isn’t written yet.

But it will be — by the choices we make today.

The Getaway

Who Profited and How We Fight Back

The vaults were emptied.
The alarms stayed silent.
And the thieves walked right out the front door — smiling, shaking hands, cashing their bonuses.

That’s the real genius of the private equity heist.

It wasn’t just that they stole from America’s businesses, workers, and communities.
It’s that they convinced everyone else to clean up the mess they left behind.

The System That Made It Possible

It wasn’t just one firm.
Or one CEO.
Or one unlucky company.

The entire financial system was rigged to make the heist possible — and to reward the looters.

Private Equity Firms

They operate within a system that incentivizes extraction over investment — because stripping assets and maximizing short-term profits delivers faster, bigger returns than building sustainable businesses.

Wall Street Banks

They package, finance, and profit from the debt that makes these buyouts possible — collecting their fees up front, no matter how many companies collapse later.

Politicians and Regulators

Decades of deregulation, tax breaks, and weak oversight have created a playground where financial engineers can do legally what used to require fraud.

Institutional Investors

Pension funds, university endowments, and wealth managers pour billions into private equity funds, chasing returns — even when those returns come from hollowing out the real economy.

In this system, it doesn’t matter if a company succeeds.
It doesn’t matter if workers are laid off, if towns are gutted, if entire industries are destroyed.
What matters is that the people at the top get paid first.

The Victims Are Always the Same

• Workers, stripped of jobs, pensions, and dignity.

• Communities, hollowed out and abandoned.

• Customers, left with fewer choices and worse service.

• Taxpayers, forced to clean up the wreckage.

This isn’t a story of individual bad actors.
It’s a story of a system that rewards looting — and punishes anyone who tries to build something lasting.

The Grift Continues

Today, in False Promises, we explored The Debt Delusion — how political leaders sell the fantasy that debt can be made to disappear without consequences.

Private equity runs on the same delusion.

The debt they create isn’t designed to be paid off.
It’s designed to be someone else’s problem.

They front-load the profits, dump the risks, and walk away before the roof caves in.

When the collapse comes, it’s always the workers, the communities, and the taxpayers who are left trying to patch the holes — while the looters move on to their next “investment opportunity.”

This isn’t bad luck.
It’s not incompetence.
It’s a business model.
It’s the model.

Fighting Back

The good news is: the heist isn’t inevitable.
And the thieves aren’t invincible.

Some ways to fight back:

• Regulate leveraged buyouts — limit the amount of debt that can be loaded onto a company.

• Ban dividend recapitalizations — prevent owners from extracting cash through forced debt.

• Hold PE firms accountable — make them liable for the debts and pensions they destroy.

• Support worker ownership models — help employees, not financiers, buy and run companies.

• Divest public pension funds — pressure state and city pensions to pull their investments out of predatory PE firms.

• Shine a spotlight — make sure every community knows the real story behind every store closure, hospital bankruptcy, or mass layoff.

This isn’t about “saving capitalism” or “hating capitalism.”

It’s about saving the parts that serve people — and smashing the parts that serve only parasites.

---

Coming up tomorrow:

Final Reflection: Two Crises, One Cause — and How We Rebuild.

(Because private equity’s heist and America’s political collapse aren’t separate stories. They’re chapters in the same book — and it’s time we started writing a different ending.)

The Debt Delusion

How Trump’s “Waste and Fraud” Promises Will Make Things Worse

Donald Trump has a simple-sounding solution to America’s rising debt: cut “waste, fraud, and abuse.”

It’s a line that plays well on campaign stages. Who wouldn’t want to eliminate waste? Who supports fraud?

But in reality, this promise is pure political theater — and a dangerous distraction from the real drivers of America’s fiscal challenges. Worse, Trump’s actual policies have already shown that cutting “waste” isn’t enough — and that his fiscal plans are more likely to grow the national debt, not shrink it.

The Myth of Easy Savings

Every politician talks about rooting out government inefficiency. But experts across the political spectrum agree:

• “Waste, fraud, and abuse” account for only a tiny fraction of federal spending.

• Even aggressive anti-fraud efforts would barely move the needle on the $34+ trillion national debt.

• The vast majority of the federal budget goes to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, defense spending, and interest on the debt — not duplicative office supplies or misfiled paperwork.

You can’t fix the federal budget with the equivalent of finding pennies in the couch cushions.

Hard choices — about taxes, healthcare costs, defense spending, and entitlement reform — are where the real math happens. And those are the choices Trump and his allies continue to dodge.

Trump’s First-Term Record: Bigger Deficits, Higher Debt

In 2016, Trump vowed not only to eliminate the deficit but to wipe out the national debt entirely within eight years.

Instead:

• By the end of his first three years (pre-COVID), the national debt had increased by 16%.

• The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act — Trump’s signature legislation — added $1.9 trillion to the debt over a decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

• Even during strong economic growth, the annual federal deficit ballooned to nearly $1 trillion by 2019 — a dangerous sign, since deficits are supposed to shrink during good times.

The Trump tax cuts were sold as self-financing through higher growth. That growth bump never materialized. Instead, tax revenue fell, and the government borrowed more.

Trump didn’t tame the debt. He accelerated it.

The Real Impact of “Cutting Waste”

When politicians do get serious about budget cuts, it’s rarely actual waste that gets slashed. It’s programs that help working Americans:

• Medicaid oversight programs that detect billing fraud? Cut.

• IRS enforcement that catches wealthy tax cheats? Cut.

• Education, housing, and food security programs? Cut.

Meanwhile, defense spending (which accounts for more than half of discretionary spending) often increases — and Trump’s 2025 budget proposals reportedly plan major hikes【source: Axios】.

In short:

• “Cutting waste” often means hurting the most vulnerable, while leaving massive expenditures untouched.

• It doesn’t address the structural imbalance caused by tax cuts and rising healthcare and retirement costs.

• It risks hollowing out public services that millions of Americans depend on.

And it won’t balance the budget — not even close.

A Future of Higher Debt and Less Security

If Trump follows the same path in a second term — more tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy, combined with vague promises of efficiency — the debt will almost certainly continue to climb.

And as debt grows:

• Interest payments will consume a larger share of the budget.

• Pressure to cut Social Security and Medicare will increase.

• Economic growth could slow under the weight of rising borrowing costs.

In other words: the people Trump promises to protect — working-class Americans, retirees, veterans — are the ones who will pay the price.

The Hard Truth: Fiscal Responsibility Requires Real Choices

The U.S. can stabilize its finances — but not with magical thinking.

Real solutions involve:

• Fairer tax policy that ensures corporations and billionaires pay their share.

• Smart investments in healthcare and education to grow the economy long-term.

• Careful reforms to major entitlement programs, balancing sustainability with protection.

Empty slogans about “waste and fraud” won’t save America from a future of rising debt and diminished prosperity.

Only honest leadership and serious policy will.

Up Next

The pattern is clear: false promises, real harm.

Finally, we’ll step back and look at the bigger picture — the choice America faces in the critical years ahead.

Debt Bombs

The Dirty Secret Behind Every Deal

If there’s one thing every great heist needs, it’s a way to destroy the evidence.

Private equity has one:
Debt.

Debt is the smoke bomb they throw as they loot the building.
The fire they set to cover their escape.

And for decades, it’s been their most powerful, least understood weapon.

The Debt Trap

Every private equity buyout starts the same way:
Not with investment.
Not with innovation.
Not with a real plan to grow the business.

It starts with a mountain of debt — debt that is immediately loaded onto the company itself, not the buyer.

It’s called a leveraged buyout (LBO).
But what it really means is this:
The company is forced to mortgage its future just to survive the takeover.

Millions, sometimes billions, in new liabilities — overnight.

The business may have been profitable before.
It may have had cash reserves, a solid workforce, strong relationships with customers.

None of that matters now.

Everything the company earns must go to paying off the debt first — before it can afford to innovate, grow, or even maintain basic operations.

And when the debt load becomes unsustainable?
The company, not the private equity owners, takes the fall.

Why Debt Is So Powerful for Wall Street

Risk is Pushed Down the Chain

The private equity firm collects management fees and special dividends almost immediately.
If the company collapses under its debt later, the firm has already been paid.

Accountability Is Dodged

When a Toys R Us or a hospital collapses, the executives blame “changing markets” or “economic headwinds” — not the crippling debt they were saddled with at gunpoint.

Profits Are Extracted Early

Private equity doesn’t wait for real success.
They extract “value” upfront, cashing in through dividends, asset sales, and rent-seeking while the company is still functioning.

Failure Becomes Someone Else’s Problem

When bankruptcy inevitably comes, it’s the workers, suppliers, and communities who suffer the fallout — pensions lost, stores closed, services eliminated.

Private equity walks away clean.

The Bigger Pattern

By 2023, more than one-third of all U.S. bankruptcies involved companies that had been owned or controlled by private equity firms.

Industries affected include:

• Retail (Toys R Us, Payless Shoes, RadioShack)

• Healthcare (Hahnemann Hospital, Prospect Medical)

• Media (Deadspin, The Denver Post)

• Manufacturing (Remington Arms, Simmons Bedding)

In every case, the pattern is the same:

1. Debt was used to finance the buyout.

2. Profits were extracted early.

3. The company collapsed under the weight.

This isn’t bad luck.
It’s not bad management.
It’s the business model.

Debt is the getaway car.

And every time it crashes into a wall, it’s the workers and communities left bleeding on the pavement.

---

Today, in False Promises, we explored The High Price of Pollution — how corporations dump their waste into the environment to protect their profits, leaving the public to pay the price.

Private equity operates the same way.

• They pollute the balance sheet.

• They strip the assets.

• They profit from the destruction.

• And they leave the cleanup — the bankruptcies, the layoffs, the broken communities — to someone else.

It’s not just about money.
It’s about making sure someone else pays for your mess.

---

Coming up tomorrow:

The Getaway: Who Profited — and How We Fight Back.

(Because the heist isn’t inevitable — and the thieves aren’t untouchable.)

The High Price of Pollution

How Environmental Deregulation Endangers America’s Future

Donald Trump has made it clear: if returned to power, he will push even harder to dismantle environmental regulations, prioritize fossil fuel expansion, and block the growth of clean energy.

It’s a familiar playbook—and it’s one that has already failed spectacularly.

From the deadly collapse of Texas’s energy grid to worsening climate-driven disasters, the evidence is overwhelming: gutting environmental protections doesn’t make America freer or richer. It makes America weaker, more vulnerable, and more expensive to live in.

The Texas Blackout: Deregulation’s Deadly Costs

In February 2021, a brutal winter storm swept across Texas, plunging temperatures below freezing. The state’s uniquely deregulated energy grid collapsed under the pressure:

• 4.5 million customers lost power.

• Hundreds died from hypothermia, carbon monoxide poisoning, and lack of access to medical care.

• Economic losses topped $100 billion.

Why did the grid fail?

Not because of wind turbines, as some politicians falsely claimed, but because natural gas infrastructure and power plants froze.

Texas had been warned about these vulnerabilities after a similar storm in 2011—but chose not to require weatherization, trusting market forces to handle it.

Energy companies had no financial incentive to spend money preparing for rare cold snaps. So they didn’t.

The result was a humanitarian and economic catastrophe—the direct consequence of decades of deregulation and short-term profit chasing.

Environmental Rollbacks Leave Americans Unprepared

Under Trump’s first term, the federal government rolled back over 100 environmental regulations, including:

• Cutting requirements for power plant emissions.

• Weakening clean water protections.

• Slashing fuel economy standards for cars and trucks.

These rollbacks didn’t make the economy meaningfully stronger. But they increased air and water pollution and reduced resilience to extreme weather events.

At the same time, climate disasters worsened:

• Wildfires torched record acreage in California and Oregon.

• Hurricanes intensified, causing massive floods from Louisiana to New York.

• Droughts devastated farms across the Midwest.

Ignoring climate risks and weakening protections doesn’t shield Americans from hardship. It amplifies it, leaving communities poorer, sicker, and more dependent on costly disaster aid.

Attacking Renewable Energy Progress

Ironically, even as Trump and other Republican leaders attacked clean energy as “unreliable,” states like Texas quietly became national leaders in wind and solar power.

In 2023, about 40% of Texas’s electricity came from carbon-free sources like wind, solar, and nuclear.

Renewables helped keep the lights on when gas plants failed. They created jobs. They lowered electricity prices.

Yet the Trump movement continues to demonize renewable energy, pushing legislation that would penalize or discourage clean energy projects, while funneling subsidies to fossil fuels.

This isn’t just bad environmental policy. It’s bad economics—and it risks ceding the clean energy race to countries like China and Germany, who are investing aggressively in the industries of the future.

The Dangerous Future Trump Offers

If Trump follows through on his second-term environmental agenda, Americans can expect:

• More grid failures in extreme weather.

• Higher health costs from pollution.

• More taxpayer bailouts for fossil fuel disasters.

• Lost jobs and missed economic opportunities in the global clean energy boom.

Environmental deregulation isn’t a path to prosperity. It’s a path to fragility, suffering, and decline.

A truly strong America invests in resilience, innovation, and public health—not in the short-term profits of the fossil fuel lobby.

The stakes couldn’t be higher. The next storm, fire, or flood will not wait for political convenience. The costs are coming—and we can choose to prepare, or to pay dearly.

Up Next

The costs of deregulation are rising — and so is the national debt.

Our next post will reveal how promises to cut “waste and fraud” won’t fix the debt, and could make it even worse.

The Silent Kill

How Wall Street Gutted American Healthcare

It didn’t start with a bang.
It started with a bankruptcy filing, quietly buried in the business section.

A hospital here.
A hospital there.

Another rural clinic shutting down.
Another wave of layoffs in critical care units.

It looked random.
It looked unfortunate.

It wasn’t.

It was part of the same heist — just playing out in a place where the victims aren’t just laid off.
They’re left to die.

The Buyouts

In the late 2000s and early 2010s, private equity firms realized hospitals could be gold mines.

Healthcare was a $4 trillion industry.
It was fragmented.
It was complex.
And it was shielded by layers of government funding.

Perfect conditions for exploitation.

Firms like Cerberus Capital Management, Apollo Global Management, and others swept in, buying up hospitals, nursing homes, emergency room chains, and outpatient clinics.

The pitch was always the same:
“Streamline operations.”
“Cut waste.”
“Deliver better, faster care.”

What actually happened was different.

The Playbook Applied to Healthcare

Step 1: Load the Hospital with Debt

Just like Toys R Us, just like JoAnn Fabrics, hospitals were saddled with massive debt the moment private equity took over.

Profits didn’t go into improving patient care.
They went into paying off loans — and into management fees for the new owners.

Step 2: Cut Staff, Cut Services

Nurses were laid off.
Maintenance crews were slashed.
Support staff were thinned out.
Entire specialty departments — like neonatal units, psychiatric services, and oncology wings — were shut down if they weren’t profitable enough.

Quality of care declined.
Wait times ballooned.
Errors increased.

Step 3: Strip the Assets

If a hospital owned valuable real estate, it was sold — often to landlords who raised rents, draining the hospital further.

If a hospital owned its own ambulance fleet, it was sold and leased back at a premium.

Everything that wasn’t nailed down — and even some things that were — was monetized.

Step 4: Exit Before the Collapse

Once the hospital was hollowed out, the private equity owners either flipped it to another buyer or let it spiral into bankruptcy.

Patients and workers were left holding the bag.
Communities were left without critical care.
Lives were lost.

The Human Cost

In Philadelphia, Hahnemann University Hospital — a 171-year-old institution serving primarily low-income patients — was bought by a private equity-backed developer.

Within a few years, it was shut down.
Hundreds of doctors, nurses, and staff were fired.
Thousands of vulnerable patients lost access to care.

The real goal was never to run a hospital.
It was to flip the valuable real estate it sat on — turning a safety net into luxury condos.

This wasn’t an isolated story.
It has happened in New York.
In California.
In rural towns across the South and Midwest.

Everywhere private equity moves into healthcare, the results are the same:

• Fewer hospitals.

• Higher costs.

• Worse outcomes.

---

Today, in False Promises, we explored The Cost of “Small Government” — how deregulation and privatization, sold as efficiency, opened the door to unchecked looting.

Healthcare shows that cost most brutally.

Private equity didn’t just loot toy stores and craft shops.
They came for the hospitals.
They cashed out.
And they left blood on the floor.

---

Coming up tomorrow:

Debt Bombs: The Dirty Secret Behind Every Deal.

(Because debt isn’t just a tool in the heist — it’s the fuse they light before they walk away.)

The Cost of “Small Government”

How Deregulation and Privatization Fail American Communities

For decades, “small government” has been a rallying cry of American conservatives. Donald Trump’s second-term agenda promises even deeper cuts to government services, more privatization of public goods, and looser regulations in the name of “freedom” and “efficiency.”

But real-world experiments with these ideas—from Kansas to Texas to the United Kingdom—tell a very different story.

Instead of prosperity, they have delivered crumbling infrastructure, weakened public services, higher costs for consumers, and growing inequality.

Trump’s plans to double down on deregulation and privatization will not make America stronger. They will leave ordinary Americans—especially his own supporters—more vulnerable and less secure.

Kansas: The Tax Cut Catastrophe

In 2012, Kansas Governor Sam Brownback launched what he called a “real live experiment” in conservative economics: massive income tax cuts, including eliminating taxes on many businesses.

The promised outcome? Explosive job growth and a booming economy.

The reality?

• State revenues collapsed by 22%.

• Public services were slashed. Schools cut programs and shortened their weeks to four days.

• The state’s bond rating was downgraded, increasing borrowing costs.

• Job growth lagged behind neighboring states that kept taxes higher.

After five years of mounting deficits and public outrage, a bipartisan coalition finally reversed most of the tax cuts to save the state from financial ruin.

Kansas showed that radical tax cuts and shrinking government don’t unleash prosperity—they cripple essential services and hurt working families the most.

Texas: Deregulation and Disaster

Texas has long prided itself on a low-regulation, pro-market model. But the February 2021 winter storm exposed the dangerous limits of that ideology.

The state’s heavily deregulated and isolated electricity grid collapsed under freezing temperatures, leaving millions without power for days.

Investigations revealed that Texas had repeatedly ignored calls to weatherize its energy infrastructure, trusting that market forces would provide resilience. They didn’t.

The cost of deregulation:

• Hundreds of lives lost.

• Tens of billions in economic damages.

• Skyrocketing electric bills for some customers who faced variable “market rates.”

Freedom from regulation didn’t deliver better service. It delivered a deadly blackout—and made it painfully clear that basic public infrastructure needs public accountability.

The UK’s Austerity Disaster

Across the Atlantic, the United Kingdom embarked on a similar path during the 2010s: cutting public services in the name of fiscal responsibility.

The result was a decade of stagnation:

• Public health outcomes worsened. A study linked over 130,000 “preventable” deaths to austerity.

• Local governments went bankrupt.

• Public transportation deteriorated, and housing shortages worsened.

• Economic growth slowed, leaving Britain worse off than major peers.

Instead of shrinking debt, austerity policies exacerbated social and economic inequality—and arguably left the country more fragile in the face of crises like COVID-19.

The lesson: you cannot cut your way to prosperity, especially by hollowing out the very systems people rely on every day.

What Privatization Really Means

When politicians talk about “shrinking government,” what they often mean is shifting essential services into private, for-profit hands:

• Public schools replaced with voucher-funded private academies.

• Public water systems privatized and then poorly maintained.

• Public health agencies defunded, leaving gaps that for-profit hospitals don’t fill.

Privatization doesn’t eliminate costs. It often increases them, adding layers of profit-seeking middlemen between taxpayers and the services they need.

And crucially: private companies are not accountable to voters. When things go wrong, there’s no election to fix it.

The Dangerous Road Ahead

If Trump’s second term follows the same playbook—tax cuts for the wealthy, deregulation of critical industries, privatization of public services—the result will be predictable:

• Higher inequality.

• More fragile infrastructure.

• Greater costs for working families.

This isn’t theory. It’s recent history.

True national strength doesn’t come from gutting the public sector. It comes from investing in it—building systems that serve everyone, not just the wealthy few.

Trump’s vision of “freedom” is a freedom for corporations and billionaires. For everyone else, it’s the freedom to fend for yourself.

Up Next

Broken public systems lead to even bigger risks.

Next, we’ll expose how environmental rollbacks and energy failures are leaving Americans dangerously vulnerable.

Collateral Damage

JoAnn Fabrics and the Death of Main Street

It didn’t happen all at once.

There was no sudden bankruptcy.
No headlines screaming the company was dead.

Instead, JoAnn Fabrics — a beloved American retailer, a gathering place for crafters, quilters, teachers, and entrepreneurs — has been slowly hollowed out, store by store, job by job, community by community.

Not by Amazon.
Not by changing tastes.

But by the same quiet financial looters who killed Toys R Us.

The Buyout

In 2011, JoAnn Fabrics was acquired by a private equity firm called Leonard Green & Partners for about $1.6 billion.

The story was familiar:

• JoAnn was profitable.

• JoAnn had strong community ties.

• JoAnn had survived economic downturns, competition, and change.

But after the buyout, everything changed.

Leonard Green loaded JoAnn with debt — hundreds of millions of dollars — and began siphoning off cash through management fees and special dividends.

Rather than investing in modernization, technology, or expanding into new markets, the focus was on extraction.

Stores started to feel neglected.
Staff levels dropped.
Inventory quality declined.

And loyal customers noticed.

The Slow Decline

JoAnn Fabrics didn’t crash overnight like Toys R Us.

Instead, it began to rot from within:

• Store locations became threadbare and poorly maintained.

• Supply chains weakened, leading to frequent stockouts.

• Skilled, full-time employees were replaced by underpaid part-timers.

• Customer service, once a hallmark of the brand, deteriorated.

Even as the company stumbled, private equity owners paid themselves well.
Leonard Green collected fees year after year — no matter how badly the business performed.

Meanwhile, JoAnn’s leadership leaned into gimmicks:

• Cheap loyalty programs.

• Low-wage hiring pushes.

• Desperate promotions to drive foot traffic.

None of it addressed the real disease: a company crushed by debt, bled by fees, and left too weak to adapt.

In 2021, JoAnn was pushed into going public again — not because it was ready, but because Leonard Green wanted an exit.

The burden of debt and decay was dumped back onto public shareholders.
The private equity firm cashed out.

The Impact on Communities

JoAnn Fabrics wasn’t just a retailer.
It was a piece of Main Street life — a place where kids picked up their first school project supplies, where small business owners sourced materials, where elderly hobbyists kept lifelong skills alive.

Its slow collapse mirrors the quiet devastation happening in countless towns across America:

• Empty strip malls.

• Fewer good part-time jobs.

• Communities losing another small anchor that made local life vibrant.

It’s not just about profits.
It’s about belonging.
And when Main Street dies, something inside the town dies with it.

---

Today, in False Promises, we explored The Authoritarian Playbook — how broken economies create broken societies, where fear, anger, and hopelessness can be weaponized.

The slow, quiet collapse of places like JoAnn Fabrics is part of that story.

When jobs dry up, when businesses fail, when trust in local institutions withers — people look for someone to blame.

And authoritarians are always ready with an answer:
Blame the immigrants.
Blame the unions.
Blame the poor.

Never blame the billionaires who gutted your town and got rich doing it.

---

Coming up tomorrow:

The Silent Kill: How Wall Street Gutted American Healthcare.

(Because the heist didn’t stop with toy stores and craft shops — it moved into hospitals, where the cost of looting is measured in lives.)